If you read the Afrikaner-African version of "history" http://www.sahistory.org.za/topic/national-party-np
In 1910 the Union of South Africa was established, and the previously separate colonies of the Cape, Natal, Transvaal and the Orange Free State became provinces in the Union. However, the union was established with dominion status, which effectively meant that South Africa was no longer a colony, but it was not independent and could not leave the empire or ignore the monarchy. After the 1910 elections Louis Botha became the first prime minister of the Union, and headed the South African Party (SAP) - an amalgam of Afrikaner parties that advocated close cooperation between Afrikaners and persons of British descent.
"Not independent" means it is a colony. in violation of international laws. How stupid must one be to believe such fraud ?
As mentioned before there is no country of South Africa, because it has no founding nation.
Just as fraudulent is the "republic" of the colony of South Africa, which is absurd because a colony cannot be a republic. A republic is a form of government where the homogeneous people who the land belongs to govern the country themselves.
The Boers were the founding nation of their country, the Boer Republics, which were founded and internationally recognized in the 1850's. I assume everyone knows what "international" means.
The British Crown issued a proclamation to Milner to destroy the Boervolk during the 2nd Anglo-Boer War wherein the British and the Afrikaners starved 35 000 children to death in their concentration camps and applied their scorched earth policy.
In 1902 the treaty of Vereeniging was signed but never honored by the British which stated the Boers will get their country back. A proclamation is a public or official announcement dealing with a matter of great importance, in other words "a must do", almost like a law.
Instead, the Afrikaner was instated as a dictator to oversee the Boers do not get their country back in violation of the international law of 1898, and the Treaty of Vereeniging.
In 1904 some 100 000 Chinese were brought in to work in the mines because THERE WERE NO AFRICANS HERE. These were later returned when Africans were brought in to work in the mines.
In 1913 the Afrikaner Hertzog wrote the 1913 land act, where with land in the Boer's country was given to the Africans the Afrikaners brought in to work in the mines.
In 1930 more Boer land was given to the Africans.
In the 1960's the Afrikaner Verwoerd announced "apartheid" to serve as a reason to give whole homelands to all the different tribes in the Boer's country.
In 1994 the rest of the Boer's country was given to the Africans. By the Afrikaner.
Since 1994 the murder rate and other crimes escalated sky high, and of course it would. Never in the history of the world has any forced multicultural cyst pot not resulted in unnatural high crime rates.
To further aggravate "crime", it was broadcast for months on end on national Tv how the Boers stole the Africans land and murdered them out by the thousands.
Farm murders is around 4000 since 2000, but the some 95000 "whites" murdered since 1994 bring the count in a different perspective.
Then if you consider the 18000 murders per year as was reported by Interpol, this dwarfs the "whites" murdered.
And that is the intention, where under the Boer genocide is hidden and classified as "crime". The genocide target is the Boers, because they have claim to their country, and everyone here who gets some advantage for himself does not want the Boers to get their country back.
This is murder by decree. It is genocide.
A further indication that this is a genocide is simply by considering that in the history of the world, every genocide has been preceded by a disarmament. There is not ONE exception. In ZERO instances where the people were armed, has a genocide ever been executed. Other than for a genocide to be executed, there is no reason for a disarmament to be done.
Boers always had guns, since the Cape days, and they committed no crimes with it. Even prior to 1994 we all had guns, those in the army had full automatic R1 rifles you ook home on pass, after military you had the same, you kept your military rifle. Get it ? There never was a reason to disarm anyone unless there is a specific agenda that is to be fulfilled.
The disarmament law 60 of 2000 was created with the specific intention to disarm people SO THAT a genocide can be executed. If you have a different opinion then I hope you will be the first victim when the door to door confiscation are going to start. They will probably call it "inspections" or any other non-threatening term to have you submit so they can violate you.
The other thing to consider is that very almost all crimes are committed by blacks, irrespective if it is black on white or black on black, and considering the amount of crimes being committed by the police themselves. This sic gun law expects me to allow foreigners, who were told I stole their land and murdered them out by the thousands, to now allow them in to violate my privacy and security when ever these foreign aliens demand.
If you read the UN's resolution 1514 of 1960 then this is exactly what is worded in the document - alien subjugation, and a violation of human rights.
Now, if you do not realize that even though you are not sung about for killing by the Africans (Kill the Boer), that you are also about to become a victim of genocide, then nobody can help you.
This disaster that has been created here with the intention that the Boers can be extinguished so that the plundering of the natural resources in the Boer's country can go on unhindered includes YOU who are also going to be exterminated.
There is only one solution for this disaster and that is that the Boers get their country back, but it is only the Afrikaners and their Africans and their controllers that does not want this to happen.
One of two things are going to happen in the colony of South Africa.
The genocide is going to continue as planned and the police is probably going to start their "inspections" soon, then after the less than 4% armed has been disarmed finally, you will know that you have made the mistake of your life, because that is what your judgment error is going to cost.
Some other authority is going to step in and oversee justice is done. A child at age 7 can already distinguish between right and wrong, what excuse will those have who are adults. There is no degree of guilty that can be used for genocide. Genocide is genocide.
I also suggest that you visit http://murderbydecree.com Murder by Decree: The Crime of Genocide in Canada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ormOIlOi4Vc Verdict and Sentence: Genocide in Canada. Look at the names.
If you are not too retarded then you will realize that the colony of South Africa's courts have just lost their authority because the British “Crown” is now a convicted criminal body without lawful authority.
Lastly you may want to look at the South African genocide flag, which is the Boer's Four Color Flag cut in two with the black wedge, symbolizing the Africans brought in the Boer's country who destroy the Boers. The Afrikaners even paint this genocide flag on their faces at rugby matches.